Problems associated with
democracy
In
my previous blog with the title “liberals versus conservatives” I explained the
government and its responsibility to society and also how liberals and
democrats believe the state should function in society. The blog was able to
create public discourse on social media and that was the point of the article.
To be consistent with sustaining the public discourse I will unpack on the
problems that are associated with democracy.
Government
exercises authority over people to create a society that is organised in a way
that the elected officials envisage. There is a political struggle between
different parties to lead in government as elected officials. The struggle varies
in different countries and can either be armed or peaceful. The struggle is won
by one party that represents an ideological view of a particular class,
tribe, group or individuals and once inaugurated to lead in government the
winning party has a responsibility to meet the expectations of its electorate. Let’s
say party X won with 55% and party Y lost with 45% the social and economic
policies of party X will be imposed on party Y. It is this factor of democracy
that leads to social unrest and violent strikes because party Y resists the
imposition of laws that they disagree with and do so by striking. Democracy is
a chef of social unrest because every protest has an element of a political
motive force. Another factor is that the voter turnout of eligible voters is
very low in many countries. For example in 1994 85.53% of the eligible voters
in South Africa voted, the figure has dropped to 59.34% in 2014 of eligible
voters that voted. This is an indication that citizens are losing interest and
faith in democracy to be able to address their pressing problems.
Parliaments
are the backbone of all democracies and people are told that the parliament is
a representation of everyone in the country. In reality the people are absent
in the decision making in parliament and that creates disconnection between the
people and the parliamentarians. The parliamentarians are also never punished
it they do not implement laws and economic objectives that they promised people
in the run-up to the elections. Each MP in South Africa represents 130 000
citizens however those MPs do not consult with each of the people they
represent and mainly keep links with their respective political parties and get
a mandate from their political parties. We are told that the parliament is a
representation of the people but the mandate that parties carry are not from
the people but from their respective parties. A parliament becomes the
parliament of the winning party. Another problem is that votes can be bought by
the rich and that disadvantages the poor as they are unable to compete in the
elections.
A
political party comprises of people who share the same belief, belong to the
same region, have a common perception and a common interest. The party that
wins the elections then imposes its values, believes and interest to the whole
country. The people who live in a country have a diversity of interests, ideas,
values and temperaments and the imposition by a party that won elections is not
liked by many communities. The reason why political parties are formed is to
rule over a nation and not only members of the party. The existence of many
political parties intensifies the struggle for power to lead in government and these
results in opposition parties attempting by all means to undermine the position
of the party that rules by denouncing and criticising in public on everything. In
some instances the opposition parties can raise a good solution in parliament
to solve a social problem and the party that rules can use its majority to
reject those great suggestions because they would not want to be seen as
agreeing with the opposition. A ruling party agreeing with the opposition would
give the opposition the ammunition to state in public that the ruling party is
useless and does what they say and use that to get some votes of the ruling
party. This battle between the parties can be at the expense of higher social
issues being overlooked. Opposition parties always cast doubt on the ruling
party even if the achievements and plans of the ruling party may be beneficial
to society. This results in members of the society being the victims of the
struggle of power between the political parties. This struggle is unfortunately
very destructive to the society as a whole. Another problem is that parties can
be bribed from either inside or outside.
These
problems associated with democracy are not only South African problems but are
a global phenomenon present in all democratic countries. I would like this
article to spark a debate so feel free to comment and indicate whether you
agree with my explanation or not. Most importantly I would like to get some
suggestions from you on how these problems can be solved or if you believe that
an alternative system of governance from democracy would be better for the
nation.